Quality, not necessarily quantity, of papers as determined by citations and impact factor. Research is most important. Regardless of your beliefs, we can use the different type models to observe our own behavior; the strengths and weaknesses, and move forward with said knowledge, constantly bettering ourselves.
Give talks wherever and whenever you can when the right people will be in the audience. Read a book, watch an in-depth movie, stretch your mental capacity.
Unless I suddenly win a Nobel prize. Andrew Dalby Seeing this my chances of tenure are zero. The point is simple: Two R01s or an R01 and other significant extramural funds. Why I find your list disappointing is that to a large degree those scientists on the front lines of scientific progress are those in the pre-tenured positions at research heavy institutions.
If tenure review committees are treating public outreach, or just general public dissemination, in a negative light, then those review committees are doing a disservice to promoting science. Alex Teaching-oriented places span a pretty wide range. Actually, a lot of them are non-flagship state schools that offer mostly bachelors degrees, a smattering of Masters degrees, and at most a few but often no doctoral degrees.
This requires a good relationship has been fostered with all involved. The only examples I can think of where genius gave a pass are in subdisciplines which are required for teaching but underpopulated by researchers. The tenure criteria are so stilted and so utterly ridiculous that we drive people to do the wrong things, and we select for people who do the wrong things.
I think that in the UK, with people who have become professors in the last 10 years or so, there is technically no such thing as tenure anymore in that they can be sacked if the budget is tight. Billy Budd, sailor Forgive my ignorance, but if you are denied tenure at one school, then what?
Keep publishing papers on the same things.
Get some slap hits on your CV as well.Mar 30, · Bit cynical, but good. Though you left out a big component that universities care about: grant money. Most fields in science expect their research faculty to bring in serious $$$.
One of the major criticisms of MBTI is that it only focuses on the positive. Maybe some do this, but if you’re approaching it the right way, you’re well aware of your weaknesses and are embarrassed by them; not turning them into fun, quirky side points of your personality.Download